DLN Energy - logo

8D Quality Report of
18650 2500Mah Battery High Resistance

D1

Problem Description

On November 27th, we received one set of returned defective 18650-2500mAh battery packs (3S) from the customer. After confirmation, it was identified as a product batch from our company in May 2023.

Through internal resistance and voltage tests, it was confirmed that there is one battery in this set with abnormally high internal resistance, while the other two batteries are normal. 

See the details in the following figure:

Battery pack structure after spot welding (3S)
Battery pack structure after spot welding (3S)
Marking information on defective sample outer casing (Batch 23E26/Unmarked)
Marking information on defective sample outer casing

D2

Problem-Solving Team

Team made up of colleagues from Quality, Production, R&D Department.

D3

Root Cause Analysis

3.1 Analysis of Internal Resistance Defects

The internal resistance value for Sample 1 : 2.3870Ω
The internal resistance value for Sample 1 : 2.3870Ω
Sample 1: Normal welding effect and structure of the internal positive tab cover
Sample 1: Normal welding effect and structure of the internal positive tab cover
Sample 1: Normal welding effect of the bottom negative tab
Sample 1: Normal welding effect of the bottom negative tab
Sample 1: Overlapping welding observed in the production of the negative tab
Sample 1: Overlapping welding observed in the production of the negative tab

3.2 Conclusion

Upon dismantling the battery, it was observed that overwelding in the production of the negative tab resulted in an elevated internal resistance. As shown in the above image, the welding surface appears to be well done, but overwelding occurred, and during subsequent vibrations in the transportation process. This overwelded area gradually detached, leading to increased physical contact resistance.

D4

Containment Action

4.1 It is recommended that after subjecting the entire batch of batteries to vibration, cells with internal resistances greater than 48mΩ should be downgraded.

4.2 It is suggested that the client performs performance/functional testing on their products, and any non-compliant items should undergo an evaluation process according to the corresponding rework procedure.

D5

Potential Corrective Action

5.1 Due to the current use of 6-micron copper foil, there is a tendency to overweld during the welding of the negative tab. We have now made adjustments by changing the upper die head size from the original 3.5mm to 2.8mm. Additionally, the lower die has been switched from the original metal-coated die to a ceramic-coated die with improved thermal conductivity. (See the diagram for reference.)

5.2 The issue of transparency has also been improved and meets the required standards.

The adjusted upper die head size
The adjusted upper die head size
The improved transparency
The improved transparency

D6

Implement Corrective Action

The vibration time was adjusted from the original 3 minutes to 5 minutes, and the vibration frequency was increased from 42Hz to 50Hz.

Before adjusting
Before adjusting
After adjusting
After adjusting

D7

Take Preventive Action

Continued Follow-up and Improvement

D8

Closure & Team Celebration

With the aforementioned measures, the issue of high internal resistance caused by overwelding in the production of the negative tab has been completely eliminated.

For the Original Report Document, please contact us.

Contact Us